WSG Newsletter: Instant Messengers -
Who's Online
Issue: October 26, 2001
There has been lots of hype about Instant Messengers (IM for
acronym lovers). This is the software that combines the convenience of email
with the immediacy of live chat. Studies by Gartner, the research group,
indicate that Instant Messaging could surpass email as the primary tool for
electronic interaction by 2005.
Why all the fuss you ask? Its just another chat service, right? Wrong.
IMs are a breed unto themselves with a unique set of features. This newsletter
describes what IMs can do, some of the uses IMs are being put to, which
are the best ones, how to go about getting and using your own IM.
What is IM?
Like
chat, IMs operate in synchronous time, that is to say, real time. You can
talk live with anyone simply by typing text. Whereas chat occurs in
a room or channel that you must connect to, instant messaging requires a
software program to be downloaded and installed. The service lets you connect
directly with other people who are online. Its a form of peer-to-peer
a bit like Napster users sharing music files.
IMs allow you to specify whom you chat with and when you chat you
invite people to be part of your buddy list, and the IM client lets you specify
your availability to chat. No one can drop in on your conversations unless you
invite them. You can chat one-on-one, have several conversations running
simultaneously in different windows, or hold a conference
conversation.
Status
One of the key benefits of IMs is their ability to notify you when your
buddies come on-line. Likewise, anyone in your buddy list will know
when you are online. Privacy features are available on IMs you can
change your status to reflect your present state: busy, on the phone, or away.
Status options vary from IM to IM. It is also possible to make yourself appear
offline, even when you arent, if you dont wish to be contacted.
Audio / Video
Some IMs come with voice and/or video capability (see the rundown of the
various software clients later). Tired of those long-distance calls? All you
need is a headset, the same IM as your buddy and voila! You can talk in
real-time all over the world for the price of an Internet connection. Add a
webcam to the mix and you can see each other as you speak! (Quality of voice
and/or video varies depending on ISP and available bandwidth.)
Surf the Web
Instant Messengers allow you to surf websites with your buddies.
While your browser is open, you can pop the IM on top and visit different
sites. You can invite your online friends to look at the website you are
viewing by cutting and pasting the URL from your browser into your IM. Your
friend(s) can click on the link, and their browser will automatically open to
the website. Odigo, one brand of Instant Messenger, lets you post notes onto
websites that other Odigo users can read.
Business Use
IMs are not restricted to home use. They are a growing phenomenon in the
workplace too.
InsightExpress found from its studies (August 2001) that,
Instant messaging is seen as a workplace tool, not a distraction.
In their survey of consumers, 47% used instant messengers, and 20% of those
used it at work instead of the phone or email.
Instant messaging can get an instant response from a coworker, instead of
having to wait for a return phone call or email.
Instant Messaging Services
The most commonly used IMs are AOLs Instant Messenger (AIM), ICQ (I
seek you), MSN Messenger, and Yahoo Messenger. According to several articles in
June 2001, AIM and ICQ have over 100 million registered users each and
Microsoft Messenger is in third spot at 32 million. Yahoo and a fifth, Odigo
are nipping at the heels with new features. Because the IM systems do not
connect well to each other (if at all) many users will have more than one IM
installed.
To see how the five most popular IMs (and a couple of others) stack up in
the opinion of this TIG staff member, read on!
AOL Instant Messenger (AOL or AIM)
(http://www.aol.com/aim/home.html)
AOL Instant Messenger may be the most popular instant messenger judging from
studies such as
InsightExpresss that finds it is used by 45% of users.
It has all the standard features of Instant Messengers: chat, instant messages,
buddy lists, graphical emoticons, the ability to transfer files, and share
URLs, online status indicator, built in search capacity, and most
recently, is Voice Stream phone capable. AIM also displays a stock ticker at
the bottom of the window. This TIGger has never been an AOL AIM user
simply because none of my buddies use it. Nonetheless, it is simple
and intuitive to use, you dont need an AOL account to use it, and in most
cases, if you have Netscape, it comes with the browser.
ICQ ( http://web.icq.com/) invented instant messaging. It was the first IM,
introduced to the Net in 1996. In 1998 AOL bought it. Today, one look at the
web site and you find yourself drawn into another world. Heck you can
send kisses and hugs. ICQ is instant messaging on steroids. Not only can you do
all the things you can do in other IM clients, you can also send messages
outside the ICQ environment to cellphones and pagers. ICQ also allows users to
hold PC to PC, PC to phone, and Phone-to-Phone calling card calls. Users can
launch Microsofts Netmeeting from the ICQ platform in order to hold a
videoconference. This TIGger likes ICQ, but knows it can be confusing to use.
Newbies to IM may prefer to start with AOL or MSN Messenger.
MSN Messenger
(http://messenger.msn.com/)

MSN Messenger has the standard features -- chat, graphical emoticons,
transfer of files, an online status indicator, and URL sharing. Users in Canada
and the US can get stock quotes through MSNs Money Central.
Microsofts NetMeeting is incorporated into the program for video or voice
conferencing and MSN Messenger is integrated with Hotmail and/or Outlook
Express. Like ICQ, MSNs IM allows you to page mobile phones with
messages. The best feature of MSN Messenger is the typing indicator which shows
when someone is typing a message. You dont have to wonder if the person
is ever going to respond! So far, this is unique to MSN Messenger, although
Yahoo Messenger has said it will be in their next release.
TIGs staff (Gwen, Laryssa, and I) often use MSN Messenger for work to
discuss current projects, trade information and files, and stay in contact.
Its invaluable for knowing when contacts are available and for the
immediacy of the contact with your buddy. MSN Messenger is simple
and intuitive to use a good introduction to the IM world.
Yahoo
Messenger
(http://messenger.yahoo.com/)
Yahoo Messenger is pushing hard to nudge ahead of MSN. It has everything MSN
has (except typing) plus weather, news, calendar, and easy access to the
hundreds of Yahoo chat rooms. As an instant messenger, YM can be set to
automatically archive conversations for ten days significantly for
privacy concerns, the archives are to your computer hard drive, not a Yahoo
server. The feature I liked best about YM was the funky font colours
available on other IMs for sure, but not in the wide range of YMs
rainbow colours! A typing-in-progress function (similar to MSN
Messengers) is to come, and the beta version of YM looks to include what
they are terming IMVironments -- you can download different backgrounds to
customize your chat environment.
Interoperability
One of the biggest drawbacks of Instant Messengers has been the lack of
messaging standards that will allow interoperation of the various programs. For
example, a MSN Messenger user cant converse with ICQ users, and vice
versa. The villain of the piece is AOL which has persistently blocked access
from other IM operators. Odigo, Jabber, and Imici, promise to bridge the gap by
offering interoperability with the major players with varying degrees of
success.
Odigo
(http://www.odigo.org)
Odigo is a small New York company who has been battling with AOL for platform
compatibility since mid-1999. It promises interoperability with AOL AIM, Yahoo
Messenger, MSN Messenger, and ICQ. However, despite all assurances to the
contrary, the feasibility of interoperability between Odigo and other IMs is
questionable. As J.D. Biersdorfer said in the
New York Times (June 16, 2001), Depending on the day
and the Odigo software version you have, you can sometimes use Odigo Messenger
to communicate with AOL Instant Messenger users, as well as with Yahoo
Messenger and ICQ devotees. Of course, as he wryly points out, as soon as
AOL discovers Odigo has a connection, they block it.
Odigo is also notable because it allows users to post notes on websites for
other Odigo users to read. When surfing the Internet, you can see who else is
at a website besides yourself and your buddy(s). Odigo has a choice of avatars
you can use to represent yourself.
|
IM and communications after the attack on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon
|
Eli Noam reported in the New York Times that email, instant messaging, and
bulletin boards were the "star performers".
"Where the Internet excelled was in e-mail, instant messaging and bulletin
boards. E- mail messages may have sometimes taken longer than usual to arrive,
but they typically did arrive. And they diverted billions of voice calls from
the long-distance telephone networks, freeing up vital network capacity. A
five-minute voice phone call consumes as much transmission capacity as about
4,000 e-mail messages of typical length. "
Testing the Communications Network, Eli Noam. New York Times.
(September 24, 2001) |
| |
Business Use of IM
|
Instant Messaging Works at Work, InsightExpress Reports
"New Research Reveals Personal Use of Instant Messaging." (August 2,
2001) Press Release from Insight Express.
Should There Be Fear and Loathing of Instant Messaging? By
Clint Boulton (August 10, 2001) Internet News -- reports on the InsightExpress
and Gartner Group studies.
Web Tools That Work: To Nail the Sale, E-Mail's Too Slow by
J. D. Biersdorfer. (June 13, 2001) New York Times -- business use of IM.
Instant Messaging: The
Sleeping Giant by Robert Batchelder David Smith (August 17, 2001) Gartner
Group -- "Instant messaging represents a largely untapped communication
technology for enterprises. In this Spotlight, we get close to this intimate
form of e-communication and size up the hurdles to enterprise adoption. "
Note: There is no direct link to the article. Must use Gartner Search to
find article.
FaceTime Communications
provides instant messaging networks for business applications. Has links to
several articles.
|
Articles
|
IM Bonanza CNet compares 8 instant messengers. (Jan 2002) by
Gregg Keizer. Picks the unknown Trillian because it will talk to AIM, MSN,
Yahoo, and IQ.[Added Sep / 02]
Instant Messaging Reviews PC Magazine -- reviews and ratings
on PC and Mac software [Added Sep / 02]
State of the Art: Messengers That Carry Big Bundles by J. D.
Biersdorfer. (June 14, 2001) New York Times -- JD reviewed the top 5 IMs and
stuck with AOL as his favourite.
Business: IM is getting out of control by Paul Festa (April
26 2001)
Meet Four IM Clients that play nice with one another by David
Coursey. (April 30, 2001) AnchorDesk. -- Has something to say about Odigo,
Jabber, Imici, and Trillian.
IM Wish List: 10 tricks we wish buddies could do by Molly
WOod (July 5, 2001). CNet. Number one wish - integration. Article identifies
nine other areas where IMs could be much better.
|
|
Sympatico Internet Messenger
(http://im.sympatico.ca/)
Canadians (and Sympatico subscribers in particular) may be interested to know
that Sympatico has licensed a version of Odigo called (Sympatico Instant
Messenger or SIM. The service is available to anyone and includes a web-based
email account with GoSympatico and web space at Tripod.ca.
This is a promising product, but both Gwen and I found the two-step
registration and download process rather involved. It took three
days to get a user number from Sympatico to proceed with the step for
downloading the software. Sympatico has a few bugs to work out yet. In our test
run of SIM, we also found it somewhat confusing to use. It took using MSN
Messenger, an IM client we were familiar with, to communicate to each other how
to use SIM! However, once we got the hang of SIM, we enjoyed surfing to sites
and sending messages.
Jabber, and Imici
http://www.jabber.com and
http://www.imici.com
Jabber and Imici are two other IM clients promising interoperability with ICQ,
Yahoo! and MSN Messenger, and AOL AIM for Imici only. In my test run of both, I
was only able to import my MSN Messenger buddy list and, despite that small
success, was unable to contact any of my online buddies.
Security Precautions
Although chatting to one buddy via an IM client may seem secure from prying
eyes and listening ears, beware of transmitting any sensitive
material such as passwords, or confidential documents, whether personal or
work-related. As an
April 2001 ZDNet News article stated, It's one of
the dirty little secrets of corporate communications: Executives and other
employees routinely chat via notoriously insecure instant messages.
According to the same article, use of IMs in corporations introduces
some of the same problems of email. IMs are also subject to viruses and
worms and can disseminate trade secrets efficiently or allow for the exchange
of libel or harassment. See the web version of this newsletter at TIG for more
articles.
Conclusion
In the end, the IM program you choose to use will be the one that your
friends or co-workers are using. You are also likely to have more than one.
The advantages of IM are fairly compelling better than phone tag,
voice mail, or the black hole of email for reaching people. IM tools are
developing into message centers for managing all communications online,
cell phone,and email, and conducting conferences. These may also become a mini
current-awareness service for news headlines and stock quotes.
Business use may increase also for collaborative work on projects as well as
online service and technical support. IM wont just be something kids do.
|
 |